Blog   5 Myths About Test Automation

5 Myths About Test Automation

By Kate Punova
11+
Reading Time: 2 minutes

Some years ago, automated testing has become one of the most promising means to accelerate product delivery and mitigate tester`s workload. As a result, QA automation brought efficiency to the whole testing process. Today, test automation is a popular trend, and, just like other popular things, it’s surrounded by stereotypes. We are here to ruin them and to tell you the truth.

  • You don’t need manual testing in case you go for the automation one. Automation can make the process of testing easier, but it is not able to replace manual testing completely. What if you have to test an absolutely new functionality? Manual testing is the only way to do this, and you can try to automate something only after it is complete.
  • It is possible to automate any manual scenario. This is another wrong idea because any automation tool has its own limits. Besides, it is easier to test certain scenarios manually, and for some of them it is the only way to be tested since it is impossible to apply quantitative description.
  • Automation means immediate benefits. To the contrary, automation can even be loss-making. First of all, it may be essential for a tester to gain new skills. Then, it is necessary to develop a plan of testing and the tests themselves and to make everything work perfectly. And this is not the end – in the future, you will have to maintain the existing tests and to develop the new ones. This process is virtually endless.
  • A universal automation tool exists. This is just a legend, and nothing more. There are no universal tools, and we doubt that they will appear soon. The problem is that such a tool would be too complicated and too expensive to develop. Just imagine – it would have to support all operating systems, be compatible with all browsers, etc.
  • Automation testing is able to cover 100% of app functionality. Well, automation testing may somehow cover 100% of lines of code, but the result will be pretty questionable. The thing is that it is impossible to check all the options of input and output parameters.

Latest Posts

QA Madness Acquires a Prominent Position Among Top Testing Companies at GoodFirms

By Anna Senchenko
2+
Reading Time: 3 minutes The article is created by GoodFirms content writer. GoodFirms recognized QA Madness for its excellent testing services and has enlisted the organization among the top testing companies in Lithuania. The company is soon
Read more

Top 10 Software Testing Blogs to Follow

By Yana Andyol
1+
Reading Time: 3 minutes While heavy books and guidelines come in handy for the enthusiastic beginners in realms of software testing, this is not quite a strategy for experienced QA engineers. The rise of Youtube and blogging
Read more

Getting QA engineers and Developers Cooperate

By Yana Andyol
1+
Reading Time: 4 minutes A work-in-progress. This is a word-match to describe the relationships between developers and QA specialists operating on the same software product. Apart from the long-lasting stereotypes, some of the strategic pitfalls and lack
Read more

Software Testing Outsource – FAQs Revealed

By Yana Andyol
2+
Reading Time: 5 minutes Since the outsource of software testing services is a multi-faceted process, it is natural for the questions to occur at any stage of cooperation with a software testing company. This is the reason
Read more

Misconceptions of the Automated Testing Debunked

By Yana Andyol
3+
Reading Time: 4 minutes Recently, automated software testing has been widely identified as game-changer for software projects. With artificial intelligence quickly gaining traction, total automation sounds like an inevitable reality. Yet those jumping to conclusions gave birth
Read more

Blog