Jon Lopinot
CTO at BRKFST
Every team has QA happening — a lot just don't have it managed well. Our experts set up the governance, define the ownership, and run the operational layer that turns reactive testing into a measurable process.
We design a QA process built around your SDLC, team structure, and release cadence. That includes test planning standards, entry and exit criteria, defect triage workflows, and documentation templates. Teams starting from scratch and teams with undocumented processes both use this as a foundation.
Our experts build a test strategy that maps coverage to business risk. Each sprint gets a defined scope, priority tiers, and pass/fail criteria before testing starts. Coverage decisions are documented and traceable — so nothing gets skipped.
We staff, onboard, and structure your QA team — whether that’s 1 engineer or 10. Roles are defined, responsibilities are split by skill level, and new team members are productive within the first week. For teams scaling quickly, we provide QA engineers directly from our network if it’s needed.
We establish a defect life cycle that stops bugs from stalling releases. Severity and priority classifications are defined upfront, triage meetings are structured, and every defect has a clear owner. Critical issues surface before they reach production.
Our experts implement dashboards and weekly reports that give engineering leads an accurate picture of quality at a glance — defect escape rate, test execution rate, coverage by module, and pass/fail trends per sprint. Reports are tailored to your stakeholders: detail for QA leads, summary for product and engineering heads.
We evaluate where your QA function sits on the maturity curve — from ad hoc testing to fully managed, metrics-driven QA — and build a roadmap to move it forward. Assessments cover process documentation, team capability, tooling, CI/CD integration, and defect data. With us, you get a prioritized improvement plan.
QA management questions come from 2 directions: teams with no QA structure trying to build one, and teams with a broken process trying to fix it. Here are what you should take into account in both of them.
Talk to our Head of Growth
Ready to speed up the testing process?