AI can never replace people’s creativity and intuition. But it’s phenomenal with data. That’s why it has found its place in an area that is considered human-led. AI for usability testing is gaining traction and already being called a game-changer. We prefer to skip loud titles and get to the bottom of things. So, let’s figure out what artificial intelligence can do, where it fails, and whether it deserves your attention.
First, we need to understand why AI is being pushed into usability testing. Is it another gimmick or an actual revolution in how we do things? Let’s start with getting to know usability and its relatives.
Usability focuses on how an actual person uses your product. It includes the technical metrics, such as ease of navigation, and, to a degree, psychological aspects, such as the emotional response. So, let’s say you’ve just downloaded a brand-new game. Your first hours will be spent on figuring out the kinks—what to do and how to progress.
During this “orientation” period, you’d also be discovering how you feel about the game.
In general, non-game context, usability is basically about people doing what they need to do without running into obstacles. Take a look at the core criteria of usability:
1. Learnability. How fast can a person figure out what they need to do to achieve their goal?
Example: a novel user opens Google Docs and doesn’t struggle to understand how to create, work, and format a document.
2. Efficiency. How quickly can a person do what they need to do?
Example: in Slack, sending a message, sharing a file, or reacting with an emoji can be done in just a few clicks.
3. Memorability. When a person returns to your app after a break, can they remember how to work with it easily?
Example: a user who hasn’t used Airbnb for months logs in and still easily books a stay because the process is consistent and familiar.
4. Error management. How many mistakes a person makes, and how gracefully can they recover?
Example: Gmail warns you if you forget to attach a file after writing “I’ve attached…” in your email. This helps avoid common errors.
5. Satisfaction. How happy is a person using the app the way it’s intended?
Example: Spotify’s clean layout, responsive controls, and smart recommendations make users feel in control and enjoy the experience.
So, usability has to do with the actions a person takes.
User experience (UX) is about what a person experiences while performing those actions. Let’s consider a scenario where you open an e-commerce page and start ordering what you want.
Overall, you’ve performed the action you wanted by ordering a product. But during this, you notice the following:
The above is an example of an app with good usability but poor UX. You did what you wanted to. But you didn’t exactly enjoy it because of all the little annoying things.
UX also has its defining aspects.
1. Usefulness. Does the app solve a real problem or meet a real need?
Example: An app tracks how many cups of coffee you drink per day. But it offers no insights, reminders, or health tips.
2. Usability. Is the app easy to use and navigate?
Example: A budget tracking app where the “Add Expense” button is tiny, hidden in a menu, and takes five steps to use.
3. Desirability. Does the app look and feel good to use?
Example: Two apps do the same thing. But one has playful icons, smooth animations, and a friendly tone. The other is plain and stiff. Of course, people will prefer the first one.
4. Findability. Can users easily find what they need?
Example: A recipe app with no clear categories, poor search, and no filters.
5. Accessibility. Can everyone use the app, including people with disabilities?
Example: A news app uses light gray text on a white background and can’t be used with a screen reader.
6. Credibility. Does the app feel trustworthy and professional?
Example: A finance app that looks outdated, has typos, and no clear privacy policy. It works, but users won’t trust it with their data.
7. Value. Does the app deliver a benefit that feels worth the effort or cost?
Example: A health app that tracks every possible stat but overwhelms users with jargon and charts. It may be powerful. But if it doesn’t feel worth learning or paying for, the perceived value drops.
So, usability is doing what you need to do. UX is enjoying what you’re doing.
User interface is very straightforward but a little tricky. When we think UI, we think design, structure, and beauty. But there’s a functional aspect to it. You can have a stunning webpage, yet if it doesn’t work properly, visual magnificence stops to matter. Briefly, UI is about the balance between being pretty and operational.
It covers the following:
So, to sum everything up:
Now, let’s get back to the start of the show—usability testing with AI.
When it comes to AI in QA automation (or AI in anything, for that matter), there’s one thing people may overlook—the huge gap between expectations and reality. We sometimes hear the famous “artificial intelligence is capable of thought, creativity, and innovation”. So, some immediately assume that AI usability testing tools eliminate the need for human labor. What they actually do is simplify it.
Even the best AI automation testing tools have their limitations. They don’t handle context well, they don’t understand user intent and nuance, and they don’t see logic behind data. AI tools for usability testing will tell you when there’s an issue. Yet, they won’t explain why it’s there.
So, when explaining how to use AI for usability testing, we must be objective. Here’s what artificial intelligence can do really well.
What can we gather from the above? That’s right, AI is incredible when it comes to working with data. But sophisticated or advanced tasks should be off-limits (for now). It’s very similar to the use of AI in UI testing services. It will definitely recognize a faulty or missing button. But it won’t tell you if an app is visually appealing overall or fits your brand.
Because of artificial intelligence’s nature, using AI for usability testing methods should also be approached carefully. That’s why here, we’ll go over testing types that benefit most from the digital mind.
AI is most effective here. It can analyze large volumes of screen recordings, detect rage clicks, identify drop-off points, and cluster usability issues across users. It speeds up reporting but can’t explain why users behaved a certain way.
AI can track completion rates, time taken, and misclicks across tasks. It can also highlight recurring failure points and suggest possible UI bottlenecks. It’s great for speed and scale, but still relies on humans to assess the clarity and intent of tasks.
AI is strong at processing behavioral data from two or more versions of a design. It can measure task success, time-on-task, or frustration signals. Though subjective preferences still need human judgment.
AI powers many eye-tracking tools, helping visualize gaze patterns, heatmaps, and attention zones. It processes large visual datasets quickly. But interpreting why users looked where they did still requires a UX expert.
AI can track user behavior over time, flag changes in patterns, and predict usability degradation. It’s useful for surfacing slow-building friction. But human review is needed to validate long-term impact.
As you can see, using AI for types of usability testing means mostly working with quantitative aspects. Don’t get us wrong. AI testing services pair superbly with qualitative research as well. You can create synthetic personas, transcribe user sessions, cluster and tag feedback, etc. Assigning AI to such tasks has two huge benefits—speed and focus.
AI can comb through tons of data while you take a five-minute break. And when you come back, you already have neat and useful info to continue your work. So you have more time for doing what brings in meaningful insights. We do encourage you to use AI for quantitative usability testing. But do remember that statistics aren’t everything.
Now that we know that AI is useful but far from perfect, let’s figure out how to work around its constraints. Long story short, you need human experience and great skills. Whether you’re working with an in-house team or QA outsourcing services—make sure you have actual specialists on your side. Because, frankly, no matter how groundbreaking an AI tool for usability testing may be, it can never replace the value of an expert’s insights.
Using AI for usability testing can tempt you to not go further. For example, let’s say a tool noticed that a user stopped doing anything right as they were about to press the “Pay” button on an e-commerce app. AI flags it as an issue. And the first assumption would be that there’s a problem with the button itself (given that everything else seems okay).
Going off of AI’s output, you go to investigate the problem. But then you realize that the button is working just fine. There’s no actual error. There are two possible scenarios after that:
If you’re going with option number one—you’re gambling. If you’re using option number two, you’re getting to the bottom of the issue, locating the real problem, and fixing it. Continuing with our little fake scenario, in the end, you find out that the user was accumulating frustration and simply rage-quit at the end. Why? The color contrast on your page was uncomfortable for the user. They were struggling to see all that time and decided to finally leave.
Given the above, it’s important to supplement AI deficiencies with human skills. The issue is finding a balance between the two. If you’re second-guessing every AI move, you’re wasting time. If you’re not using it at all, you’re missing out.
The first thing you need to do is proper research on AI usability testing tools. Pick the one that fits your needs and niche. Then, make sure you have a specialist on your team with AI proficiency who knows your tool well. After all, you’ll need to set up, run, and maintain it.
Use AI usability testing for straightforward tasks with no room for speculation, such as fundamental accessibility checks, and data processing, such as feedback analysis. Rely on your team when human judgment is essential, such as during moderated usability sessions.
Remember that you may approach such a balance differently. Every project is unique, after all. But if you’re just figuring stuff out, we recommend using AI for data and letting people do the rest.
This issue is very simple but might be overlooked. To avoid worry and potential legal troubles, make sure your AI tool has clear policies on:
And keep in mind that AI usability testing tools that don’t disclose such info just might dabble in other bad stuff. Manipulating insights or simply lying to make the provider look good—these are always a possibility.
“You are what you eat” is very fitting when it comes to AI. Because it feeds on data. And if that data is of poor quality, you can’t really trust your usability testing tool. So, here’s what you need to do:
Most importantly, include AI specialists, UX researchers, etc., when reviewing AI-generated insights.
AI tools for usability testing might not offer the most precise insights when it comes to subtleties, context, or cultural nuances. Frankly, they might just miss them. Even if you work with the best AI model there is, mistakes or false positives can still appear. There are only two ways to mitigate this. Keep refining your tool with high-quality data that’s relevant to different user groups. And rely on people when it comes to complex stuff, such as validating appropriateness.
This section concerns two points:
Yes, you got it. You need skilled people. People who can maintain your tool and make sure it actually does what it should. And people who can successfully work with complex usability aspects.
Keep in mind that usability testing can be conducted during different phases of development. If you’re working with it at earlier stages, you can rely on QA engineers to cover the fundamentals. For example, QA Madness’ experts can run basic usability checks as they’re working on other aspects of your product. This way, you can secure core usability practices early on. And further checks will have a solid base and go quicker.
Let’s sum up the key takeaways from this article.
AI models don’t work on their own. Plus, there are many things they’re not yet equipped to do. So, when it comes to the decision on whether to include AI in usability testing at all, remember that it’s really about whether you have what AI needs to function in your favor.
The single metric of load time can make or break your conversion, user satisfaction, and…
Give people enough time and they'll turn the most incredible thing evil. In the case…
Mobile accessibility testing seems to be looking at its breakthrough years. And your business' response…
It all depends on how you use it. Sorry to everyone looking for a simple…
Software accessibility is not optional. Inclusive digital experiences are required by governments. And they aren't…
Banking applications have become the essentials to have on our smartphones. Yet, with all the…