The single metric of load time can make or break your conversion, user satisfaction, and revenue. Imagine what combined performance criteria can do to your app. You’re well aware of the impact performance testing has on your product. And you know that it’s tricky to run. That’s why we’re here to figure out how to simplify and refine it. So, let’s learn how to productively couple automated software testing services and performance tests.
Anything can be automated. The real question is, will that “anything” produce quality results when automated? Luckily, in the case of performance automation testing, the active phase (test runs and report generation) is fully executable by tools. You can even use AI to design investigation scenarios and analyze the outcomes.
But automated software performance testing doesn’t necessarily presuppose taking care of the entire cycle.
To figure out what automated performance testing services actually mean, let’s take a look at their behind-the-scenes.
As you can see, automation performance testing is test execution and report generation only. We’re not saying that it’s too little of a contribution. This seemingly small part is insanely useful. But to make something out of it, you still need a dedicated QA team. Engineers do the bulk of the work. They:
These steps are where the actual results happen, and thanks to which your app advances. Automation, on the other hand, supports your efforts. It:
Overall, automation and performance testing are a powerful combo. But they don’t become one unless you have a skilled crew to make them collaborate.
Automated load and performance testing are often used interchangeably. That’s a bit misleading, so let’s resolve this right away. Performance is an umbrella term. Load testing is a type of performance testing. That’s it.
As a practice, automated high performance testing is very multifaceted. It includes different types of checks to give you the best understanding of your system. And, of course, to make sure there’s nothing to frustrate your customers.
All of these test types have their nuances and require a great deal of skill. The good news is that automated performance testing specialists can easily handle them. The only trouble is finding talent that can cover all that.
Manual software testing can be introduced at any point in development, and it’ll work just fine. If you do that with automation, you’ll only find trouble. To work, it needs a base. That means having a more or less stable baseline for your performance tests. When you ignore this, you’ll have to switch and tweak your scripts to account for any changes in the product.
So, first, you run manual tests to establish the benchmarks for response times, throughout, and system behavior. Then, you’ll have a steady flow to automate. And you can amplify it once you’ve added more stable scenarios.
If you’re wondering what’s a good moment to automate, i.e., when automation works the best, these would be your top picks.
If your app is too buggy, performance issues might just be caused by broken features. Wait until the main elements work well. Then, automate to get accurate, meaningful results.
More users or big changes can stress your app. Automated tests help you check performance quickly and often, so nothing breaks when traffic goes up or features roll out.
CI/CD means fast, frequent updates. Automating performance tests lets you catch slowdowns before they reach users.
Running the same performance tests by hand takes time. If it’s holding up your releases, automation saves time and keeps things moving smoothly.
Some problems only show up over time, like memory leaks or slowdowns under load. Automated tests can track these things consistently and alert you when something slips.
The thing about automated performance testing, is that you can’t really use it just because you want to see its benefits. For those to actually appear, you need to put in quite a bit of effort. So, before you decide to introduce automation, you need to think about whether it’s going to work out at all. You should also consider whether you have the resources to support it.
Speaking of the effort going into automation, let’s break it down. Let’s say you already have your dream QA engineers, true specialists in automated website performance testing or what have you. What needs to happen before you get your first results?
Before anything, you need to know what you’re testing and what problems you’re trying to catch.
Basically, here, you’re determining what your team will be doing and how.
Next, it’s time to design tests that simulate how people actually use your system.
Remember that there are automated performance testing tools that let you create scripts without needing to code. But you’ll still need it if you’re dealing with complex user flows, dynamic data, custom logic, and fine-grained tuning. So, consider this during tool selection.
Once your tests are ready, you don’t want to run them by hand every time. This is where you automate them.
This is when your scripts actually simulate traffic and hit your system with the planned load.
As the test runs, you want to collect both user-facing and backend performance data.
All that data you collect needs to be turned into insights. At this stage, you start to figure out what went wrong, where, and why.
When you find issues, your team will fix them and run another round of testing to see if the errors have been amended.
After these phases of automated performance testing comes support. It’s the upkeep of your tests and processes. You’ll:
That’s another unique feature of automated software performance testing. It needs continuous maintenance. So, you should never overlook proper documentation. Keep everything organized and share found knowledge. Then, future work with automation will be much easier.
Deciding between hundreds of automated performance testing tools is hard enough. Well, allow us to complicate things a little more. When selecting a tool, there are four key aspects you should really consider.
How well does the tool cover your needs:
Can the tool integrate with your workflows:
Does the tool scale easily:
Is the tool easy to work with:
You’ll need to ask yourself and your team all these questions. Not just “what reviews does this tool have?” or “is it well-regarded?”. Another point over which you’ll debate is whether to go with a proprietary or open-source option.
Open-source automation tools for performance testing are:
On the other hand, they:
Proprietary automated performance testing tools are:
Yet, they are not free of vices either:
Overall, be sure to conduct proper research on the tools and look at your options from different angles. Also, do ask your team for input. They might already have some great suggestions and their experience will help you pick faster and better.
While on the topic of teams, let’s take a look at how outsourced QA can help them. Cooperating with external expertise is rather common. In the case of automated performance testing, this approach is popular because you can have a sort of separate crew that takes care of a big chunk of work. All the while, the rest of the team focuses on other tasks. So, it’s mostly a matter of efficiency, especially given that some performance tests can run for months.
But that’s not all QA outsourcing services have to offer.
Outsourced expertise is a genuinely foolproof way to advance your project. The only risk to this is accidentally partnering with a subpar company. Read on for a brief guide on how to avoid getting your team into the mess that unreliable providers can create.
Remember the phases of automated performance testing we discussed earlier? An outsourced provider can cover all of it and more. That’s actually the best thing about working with a QA company — you can hire one to do anything:
You don’t have to collaborate with a provider fully. By that, we mean that you can hire specialists even if you need assistance with one specific part of automated performance testing. That’s a great way to get the exact perks you want and save money. And when you see QA outsource benefits in action, you can always request additional support.
If you’re considering working with a QA provider, you should always start with research (not search). Typing in “QA companies” might not work in your favor, as there are many ads, paid placements, and superficial AI advice. The best way to start is by heading to reputable sources, like G2, Gartner, or Clutch. These platforms keep all the info you might need organized. You can find service descriptions, reviews, and even prices in one place. Here are the key things to look for.
Focus on organizations with proven experience in performance testing, especially in your industry or with apps similar to yours. Look through testimonials to figure out what kinds of projects a company worked with and what was the result of the cooperation. Be sure to check the firms’ sites to find case studies. And don’t hesitate to ask for references or schedule an introductory call.
Make sure the external team is skilled in tools that fit your needs. Keep in mind that they shouldn’t push for tools of their choice, e.g., something they’re used to. They should help you choose software that’s right for you. Also, be sure to check out the available tech stack.
Ask about the company’s testing approach. A good partner should have a structured process and be able to walk you through it on the spot. If you’re looking into developing a testing strategy from scratch, keep an eye out on how the provider approaches it. When they immediately go for “the standard flow”, it might signal that the team doesn’t understand your unique challenges and needs.
Ask if the team can scale up tests quickly, run them from different geographic regions, or simulate complex user behavior over time. They should have access to cloud-based testing platforms. Those allow crews to run large, distributed performance tests without hardware limits.
With automated performance testing, there’s no “we’ve tested it, goodbye”. So, you should pay extra attention to what a provider does after test execution. Do they offer post-testing support? Can they present all-stakeholder-friendly reports (as opposed to highly technical or raw data)? Can they develop recommendations that are grounded and actionable? Be sure to discuss these points before you decide on the QA company.
You want a partner who explains things clearly, updates you regularly, and responds quickly. If a team is hard to reach or dodgy with their answers, you can be sure that the entire cooperation will be like it — delayed and careless. If a provider brings up the aspect of communication channels and availability times early, that’s usually a good sign.
Look for flexible pricing and engagement models (project-based, hourly, etc.). And make sure there are no hidden costs, especially for tooling or cloud usage. For example, QA Madness offers a few cooperation modes, such as part-time, dedicated team (a crew centered on your needs at any time), and estimate (paying only for what’s done, whatever it may be).
Apart from the above, you should also inquire about data and IP protection measures. Automated performance testing often involves access to sensitive environments or data. So, ask about NDAs, data handling policies, and how test data is stored and deleted.
Finally, we recommend scheduling a preliminary meeting. It doesn’t obligate you to anything. But you can learn a lot about the provider by how the representative carries themselves, answers your questions, and what they ask about your project.
Often, when people hear “automation”, they immediately think about speed, accuracy, and less manual effort. The thought about the amount of work it all requires comes second. That’s exactly how companies end up with a stressed team, less-than-desired quality, and a potentially sabotaged app. So, with automated performance testing, your priority should be getting everything it needs ready. That “everything” is usually just one thing — skills.
Because once you have genuine specialists on your crew, the rest is a done deal.
AI can never replace people's creativity and intuition. But it's phenomenal with data. That's why…
Give people enough time and they'll turn the most incredible thing evil. In the case…
Mobile accessibility testing seems to be looking at its breakthrough years. And your business' response…
It all depends on how you use it. Sorry to everyone looking for a simple…
Software accessibility is not optional. Inclusive digital experiences are required by governments. And they aren't…
Banking applications have become the essentials to have on our smartphones. Yet, with all the…